Genre
The Hate U Give Book Review

In this day in age, race relations are undergoing rapid change. It has gotten to a point where people are reevaluating what progress has been made since the Civil Rights Movement and how far we need to go in order to truly achieve racial equality. Since the Black Lives Matter protests started in May, people have been reading mainly nonfiction books about racial prejudice in America in order to open their eyes to the discrimination that black people face on a daily basis. I went in a slightly different direction. Sure, I have read materials and watched informative videos on white privilege, police brutality, and how racist current laws are in this county, but I decided to read The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas. As I mentioned in my The Tea Girl of Hummingbird Lane review, fiction allows writers to create stories that are based around certain facts, and they permit readers to take a look at how the people involved feel. Because I am white, I don’t think I will fully know how black people in this country live despite its inherently racist foundation, but I want to at least feel empathy for what they go through, and this is what The Hate U Give effectively provides.
The Hate U Give centers around Starr Carter – a 16-year-old who lives in a poor black neighborhood but goes to a fancy suburban prep school. She has to maintain the balance between these worlds until one day, her childhood best friend Khalil is fatally shot at the hands of a police officer. Khalil was unarmed. Soon after, his death becomes a national headline, with some people thinking that he was a thug and even a drug dealer. Even one of Starr’s white friends thinks that he had it coming. When it becomes clear that the police have little interest in investigating the situation, protests break out, and her neighborhood turns into a war zone. The only person who knows what truly happened is Starr, but revealing the truth could destroy her community and even endanger her life.
Very recently, I read a Time 100 Talks interview with the author that contained how she believed that the book and ones similar to it helps empower young voices to stand up for justice (https://time.com/5875827/author-angie-thomas-time-100-talks/), and I couldn’t be happier. She mentioned that the key is diverse storytelling, as in one has to create “mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors,” so people can not only see themselves, but also others not like them to build empathy.
When it comes to building empathy, Thomas is a true expert. Throughout the book, Starr wants to speak out about what happened in regards to Khalil’s death, but a lot of circumstances hold her back like a rival gang harming her family for snitching, the possibility of her white friends being insensitive, and other police officers not taking her seriously and assuming other things about her friend. With clear context like these, it will make readers stop and think before they accuse Starr of not speaking up sooner. In addition, other characters, both main and supporting, are relatable in one way or another. For instance, Starr’s dad Maverick is a former gang member who is completely devoted to his children. He protects them from harm because he was in prison for a few years. As a result, he missed out on some important milestones, so now, he wants to be in their lives as much as possible. This explains why Thomas wrote a book about his life with Concrete Rose, which will be released in January. However, he has preconceived notions about white people, which prevents Starr from telling him about her white boyfriend Chris for about a year. Eventually, they meet, and he even teaches Chris how to box. Even the white officer who shot Khalil is given empathy as the news mentions that he has a family and was scared for his life when he pulled the trigger (despite that none of the black characters buy this explanation).
Like with Turtles All the Way Down, it also helps that the topic of police brutality is treated in both a palatable and non-sugarcoated manner. In the beginning, readers witness the crime through Starr’s eyes. Her frustrations with people not listening to the truth or taking it seriously are given weight. The protests are seen as both justified and non-justified. It goes into the latter when they are ransacking businesses, which worries the family as Maverick owns a grocery store in their neighborhood.
All in all, The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas is a powerful book that can appeal to everyone regardless of age and race. This has been mentioned before by other reviewers, but it is worth mentioning again: the way that the book creates empathy for all is top notch. It also makes the situation very realistic. So, if you haven’t read the book, do so soon! It can help empower people to stand up for justice.
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!
That’s Me, Groucho!: The Solo Career of Groucho Marx Book Review

I’m a huge Marx Brothers fan; I have read a ton of books about the legendary comedy team. Usually, they tend to focus on their movies and their personal lives. When these books get around to talking about Groucho’s solo career, which entailed stage, radio, movies, and television, they do this in about a chapter or less (with the exception of You Bet Your Life). Luckily, lifelong Marx Brothers fan, co-host of the Marx Brothers Council Podcast, and author of The Annotated Marx Brothers: A Filmgoer’s Guide to In-Jokes, Obscure References and Sly Details Matthew Coniam has filled this gap with his 2016 book That’s Me, Groucho!: The Solo Career of Groucho Marx. It’s a great for any Marx Brothers aficionado, and I really mean any Marx Brothers aficionado.
In great detail, the book dives into Groucho’s solo career from being the first brother to be in Vaudeville in the 1900s to the 1976 reissuing of his book Beds the year before he passed away. Coniam clearly admires Groucho for his wit and swagger, but he can also be critical about his work at times. For example, while he likes his solo film Double Dynamite, he is more mixed on the movie A Girl in Every Port. Like other fans, he too is baffled by why Groucho participated in Skidoo. This allows him to be objective about his subject at much as possible. And of course, I have to talk about how Coniam cites his sources with a detailed bibliography and thorough chapters/appendix notes as well as provides captions with the photographs used. One might be surprised when a nonfiction book does not contain those aspects, but believe me, I have learned to be entirely grateful when one puts in the effort to show their credibility (see The Cold War review).
The book contains not one, not two, but FIVE appendixes written by Coniam and Marx Brothers Council colleagues Noah Diamond, Gary Westin, and Jay Hopkins. They touch upon a variety of aspects of Groucho’s career that were not mentioned in the actual book like whether or not he actually said the infamous cigar line and his theory of creativity. These should intrigue Marx Brothers lovers. My personal favorite was “Anatomy of a Mustache” by Diamond, which analyzes the evolution of the iconic thick, black greasepaint (and eventually real) mustache.
Throughout the book, I learned about certain aspects of Groucho’s solo career that I never would have thought about before. For instance, when Groucho reached new heights of fame with You Bet Your Life, his name and image were used in napkins that contained jokes and cartoons that he approved beforehand. He promoted them in magazine and newspaper ads, and according to Coniam, “what the napkins show us is the final and complete severing of Groucho the man and Groucho the icon” (p. 81). In other words, Groucho became immortalized not through film and television, but through napkins and other ephemeral merchandise.
One problem that I noticed while reading this is that Coniam has a tendency to phrase things that might not be immediately understandable to the readers. For example, when he talks about Groucho leaving for England to film Groucho aka the British version of You Bet Your Life, he describes it this way, “He was telling the truth, but what may have sounded an exciting new departure was undertaken, once again, à la rescherche du temps perdu” (p. 108). Luckily, Google is always there to help.
Another, and more immediate, issue that I saw with this book is that it’s not for all readers. What I mean is that it’s not for those who are just starting to get into the comedy team. For example, Coniam writes that Groucho had a gig as the host the radio program Pabst Blue Ribbon Town, but “within a year he had been replaced by Kenny Baker, the singing circus owner” (p. 40). Now, that might fly over the heads of anybody who hasn’t watched the Marx Brothers film At the Circus, in which Baker does play a singing circus owner. Even the chapter names are quotes that mainly diehard Marx Brothers fans, especially those who know a lot about Groucho’s solo films, would know like “I wish Harpo and Chico were here.”
I experienced a similar issue with Caterham Sevens: The Official Story of a Unique British Sportscar From Conception to CSR, where it contained a lot of car jargon that I couldn’t wrap my head around without looking up certain terms on the Internet (or asking my car crazy fiance.) Besides my present knowledge of the Marx Brothers, the main difference between the Caterham Sevens book and this one is how they target their audiences. In the former, the author Chris Rees tries to reach out to those who love cars even if they know very little about the vehicle in question because one is more likely to run into a car expert than into a Marx Brothers one. Rees does this through a variety of methods like car lingo and pop culture references. In the latter, Coniam is very aware that being a Marx Brothers fan is very niche. In fact, his aims for the book are “more to divert the confirmed enthusiast than to introduce the subject to the newcomer” and “to dig beneath the surface, and see if there are any surprises hiding there” (p. 3). Therefore, those who read this book should already have basic knowledge of Groucho’s solo career. Those who want to get into the Marx Brothers can read books like Groucho, Harpo, Chico, and Sometimes Zeppo by Joe Adamson and watch documentaries like Marx Brothers in a Nutshell.
All in all, That’s Me, Groucho!: The Solo Career of Groucho Marx by Matthew Coniam is a wonderful add to the Marx Brothers book universe. Even though its appeal is primarily for Marx Brothers fans, readers will appreciate the research and information that even the most diehards might not know. As a huge fan myself, it was definitely a book that I couldn’t put down.
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!
49 Books* Ranked From Worst to Best
*I know that some are movie adaptations, but that’s besides the point.

It seems so unbelievable that I’m now approaching my 50th book review. To celebrate this, I will rate each of the 49 books that I have reviewed on this site. These are based on the rates that I gave them on Goodreads.com, but some have changed since their initial postings.
Here is the chart that I used to rate^ them:
* = Bad
** = Meh
*** = Decent
**** = Good
***** = Great
^Note: The books within each rating are in no particular order.
Now, let’s begin!
*
- The Polished Hoe by Austin Clarke
- Final Jeopardy by Linda Fairstein
**
- The Biggest Lie in the History of Christianity: How the Modern Culture is Robbing Billions of People of Happiness by Matthew Kelly
***
- Richville: A Chance for Redemption in a Town Without Pity by Robert C. Jones
- The Bouncer by David Gordon
- Tangerine by Christine Mangan
- (I was originally going to put this under two stars, but I placed it here simply because I understood the reasons why it was being adapted by George Clooney’s film company.)
- The Cold War by Norman Friedman
- The Atomic City Girls by Janet Beard
- Knitting for the First Time by Vanessa-Ann Collection
- Kill the Farm Boy by Deliah S. Dawson and Kevin Hearne
- The Widow by Fiona Barton
- Secrets of Eden by Chris Bohjalian
- The Summons by John Grisham
****
- The Island of Sea Women by Lisa See
- (I originally had this as three stars, but looking back on that review, I realized that four stars is more deserving since the only real problem I had with it mainly occurred in the first third of the novel.)
- Oasis by Bharat Krishnan
- Divan of Shah by Rizvi Shah Asad
- One Day in December by Josie Silver
- You Can’t Spell America Without Me: The Really Tremendous Inside Story of My Fantastic First Year as President Donald J. Trump (A So-Called Parody) by Alec Baldwin and Kurt Andersen
- (I had this as three stars, yet recently, I realized that I wanted to go back to 2017-2018, where all we had to be concerned about with Trump was the 2016 election interference and the border wall. Also, certain kinds of comedy are meant to make people uncomfortable as well as laugh, and political satire falls into that category.)
- Richville: Another Tale of Travail and Treachery by Robert C. Jones
- The Four Sworn: Spring Equinox by Lenore Sagaskie
- The Vampire of Maple Town by Kane McLoughlin
- The Flight Attendant by Chris Bohjalian
- Caterham Sevens: The Official Story of a Unique British Sportscar from Conception to CSR by Chris Rees
- Once Upon a River by Diane Setterfield
- The Rosie Project by Graeme Simsion
- Glass Houses by Louise Penny
- Where’d You Go Bernadette Movie Version
- Where’d You Go Bernadette by Maria Semple
*****
- Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl
- A Tree Grows in Brooklyn Movie Version
- Before We Were Yours by Lisa Wingate
- Always Look on the Bright Side of Life: A Sortabiography by Eric Idle
- How to Punch Kids in Bathrooms by John Marszalkowski
- Turtles All the Way Down by John Green
- Dear Fahrenheit 451: Love and Heartbreak in the Stacks: A Librarian’s Love Letters and Breakup Notes to the Books in Her Life by Annie Spence
- A Man Called Ove by Fredrik Backman
- Buy My Book: Not Because You Should, But Because I’d Like Some Money by John Marszalkowski
- Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine by Gail Honeyman
- The Tea Girl of Hummingbird Lane by Lisa See
- The Four Sworn: Summer Solstice by Lenore Sagaskie
- Confessions of a Campaign Manager by Bharat Krishnan
- The Great Alone by Kristen Hannah
- The Paris Architect by Charles Belfoure
- The Child by Fiona Barton
- We Need to Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver
- The Field Guide to Dumb Birds of North America by Matt Kracht
- What the Eyes Don’t See: A Story of Crisis, Resistance, and Hope in an American City by Mona Hanna-Attisha
- The Survivors Club by Lisa Gardner
- Tesla: Inventor of the Modern by Richard Munson
And there you have it! Let me what you think via Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or email!
For my upcoming book review, all I can say is that it’s about one of the most famous mustached comedians of the 20th century! See ya next week!
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!
Oasis Book Review

Full disclosure: I was given a free PDF copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.
There are some books that I finish pretty quickly and others that take me longer to read. This is not to insinuate that I enjoyed the former more because it held my interest longer than the latter. Sometimes, it is worth taking more time to read a book in order to appreciate it better. I realized this after reading Oasis by Bharat Krishnan.
In Oasis, there once was two kingdoms: one named Desperaux, which controlled the west with magic, and other named Desire, which maintained power in the east with steel and science. However, the magic disappeared, which made the world change, and Desire wanted to maintain the new order. On Juno’s wedding day, their Mengery soldiers stormed through the Nine desert and ripped his world apart. Now, Juno journeys to the east with his adopted brother, Trey, for revenge after the murder of his family. They encounter bandits and magical creatures that live in the Nine, but once they get to Desire, they will face their biggest obstacles – their own fears and ambitions.
There are some reasons why it took me longer. The first being that I don’t usually read a lot of fantasy. In fact, the last two fantasy books that I have reviewed on this site were ones that were either based on fairy tales (The Vampire of Maple Town), or a parody of the said genre (Kill the Farm Boy). I have absolutely nothing against the category. I simply take a little longer to read it. The second is that the novel contains a lot of details. It has plenty of characters and specifics related to world building. Many were pretty interesting, yet I sometimes wondered if it was too much (who was Tsoul again?). Nonetheless, every time I came back to the book, I immediately remembered where I was at. Krishnan knows how to end chapters with a bang, especially if it’s reminiscent of the red wedding from Game of Thrones.
The novel is from Juno’s perspective, but it alternates with that of Trey. It’s divided into four parts. The first part is devoted to Juno, and the second one is about Trey. The third and fourth sections swap between the two, even during a single chapter. I didn’t mind this because these characters are written with clear and distinct voices. Juno is a kind, but passive guy, who, throughout the novel, evolves into the leader of the rebel camp as their savior. Trey is a more assertive and anger-filled person with abandonment issues, who works his way up from a chief’s assistant to the king of Desire.
I really like how the novel focuses on brotherhood and the consequences of not taking any action. Usually, a lot of books in the fantasy genre have a lot of romance between the main and supporting characters. While Oasis has some of that, the focus is on the relationship between Juno and Trey as brothers. They had been together since Juno’s family adopted Trey and his sister Drea when they were kids. As the book progresses, the two become separated both physically and mentally even though both of them thought they knew one another.
In addition, I like how it acknowledges that even not doing anything can lead to some dangerous results. In the beginning of the novel, Trey gets consumed by some demons and is later separated from Juno. Those fiends grow inside Trey throughout the novel, and they even convince him that Juno is not the friend that he thought he was. Juno spends a good chunk of the novel wanting to know if his brother does not have the demons anymore. At the climax, Trey accuses Juno of not helping him fight them, but the latter asserts that it was not that he didn’t care, it was that he didn’t know what to do. Readers might see this with political implications as some might conclude that the lack of action is equivalent to contributing to something evil.
Oasis by Bharat Krishnan is a good read. For me, it took a long time because there was so much to absorb. However, what I got out of it really stuck with me. The characters are well-thought out, and some emphasized aspects like brotherhood and the consequences of not doing anything help make it stand out among other fantasy books. I recommend this book to those who like this genre, especially if they want something a little bit different.
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!
Book Reviews From the Vault: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory – Audiobook Narrator Edition – Eric Idle vs. Douglas Hodge


Next week marks what would have been Roald Dahl’s 104th birthday. To celebrate this, I analyzed which actor captured the spirit of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory with their audiobook narration better. Will it be Eric Idle or Douglas Hodge? Let’s see how they did!
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl is one of the most beloved children’s novels of all time due to its whimsical nature and memorable characters. It has recently come to my attention that not one, but two actors have recorded the audiobook of this classic story. These actors are Eric Idle and Douglas Hodge, and both have their own connections to the story itself.
Eric Idle is one of the founding members of the comedy troupe Monty Python, and he was considered for the role of Willy Wonka for both the 1971 and 2005 movie versions. He recorded his version of the story in 2003 and later earned a Grammy nomination for his performance.
Douglas Hodge is a Tony-award winning English actor and playwright known for co-writing the play Pacha Mamma’s Blessing. He played Willy Wonka in the 2013 West End musical production of the book prior to its transfer on Broadway. He recorded his version in 2013 as promotion material for the musical.
Whose is better at capturing the spirit of the book? Let’s find out!
1. Charlie Bucket:
Idle voices Charlie with politeness and whispers a lot of his lines. While it doesn’t add a whole lot to Charlie’s personality, Idle gives him humility as a way to stand out from the rest of the chosen children.
Meanwhile, Hodge gives the same amount of humility to the character, but with more urgency and less whispering. This allowed me to not adjust the volume as much whenever Hodge was pretending to be Charlie. Also, the increased urgency permits Hodge to savor everything that Charlie says as if he was constantly eating some of Wonka’s chocolate bars.
First point goes to Hodge!
2. Grandpa Joe:
Idle channels fellow Monty Python member Michael Palin by giving Grandpa Joe a Yorkshire accent. He maintains this accent for Joe for the duration of the book, which helped me to know who was talking and give me a distinct connection to the character.
Unfortunately, Hodge let me down with his performance of Grandpa Joe. He essentially imagines Joe as an older version of Wonka, which I would not mind as much if it weren’t for the fact that I had a hard time figuring out when Hodge was speaking as Joe. One of the most important aspects of recording audiobooks is to distinguish each and every character, even if it is very slight, and I felt that Hodge fell short with voicing Grandpa Joe.
Idle has now scored a point!
3. Supporting Characters:
Idle gives Augustus Gloop a hollow sound and mumbles the majority of Mike Teavee’s lines; both were done very well. However, Idle stands out with his vocal deliveries of both Violet Beauregard and Verruca Salt. Violet is portrayed as a fast-talking gum chewer, who could care less of what other people thought when she stuck her gum behind her ear. Idle rapidly fires through her initial Golden-Ticket-finding speech with great articulation. Meanwhile, he provides Verruca a contrasting, nasty, self-indulgent American accent. This particular switching of accents was very interesting to me since in the films, she is depicted as being British, while as Violet and Mike were the American children. Nonetheless, he enunciates Verruca extremely well and consistently. On the other hand, I cringed when he chanted as the Oompa Loompas simply because he cannot rap. It almost seemed like he was still trying to feel the rhythm when he needed to record right at that moment, and it did not feel consistent as a result.
Like Idle, Hodge gives Augustus Gloop a hollow sound, but he tries to do a German accent, which was pretty good. Hodge also voices Violet Beauregard and Verruca Salt as one would expect while watching the 1971 movie (or at least as close to it as possible), and it was pretty convincing. He stands out in particular with his vocal performances of Mr. Salt – Verruca’s father – and Mike Teavee. Mr. Salt is the one with the Yorkshire accent, while the other members of the Salt family do not speak with that dialect (or at least I did not hear it as much as I did with the father). Regardless, this shows a lowly nature of the Salts despite their high status. With Mike, Hodge voices him like a slurring rock star. I thought that this was an interesting take, but the problem with this was Mike sounds a lot older than the rest of the kids, even though it is implied that all of the chosen children are around the same age. It was a good idea, but it needed tweaking in the overall execution. I still cringed during his chanting as the Oompa Loompas, but not quite as much as I did when Idle performed it. Hodge demonstrated a better flow than Idle did, which made it more tolerable.
Having evaluated these supporting characters, Idle gets another point.
4. Character Consistency:
Idle is known for doing a variety of silly voices throughout his career, so it was interesting to hear how he manages to voice one character and then quickly switch to another. It was mostly consistent. There were 1-2 times; however, in which I heard him slip into his English accent while voicing an American character. Along with this, there was also one place in the story, in which he accidentally voices an English character with an American dialect.
Hodge was also fairly consistent. There were times that he too, slipped into his English accent while voicing the American and German characters.
At this point, I will give both Idle and Hodge half a point each because maintaining dialects for every character is hard!
So far, here are the scores:
Idle: 2.5
Hodge: 1.5
5. Pacing:
One book reviewer thought that Idle was too nimble in his narration. Listening to it, I can understand why that person felt that way, but it didn’t really bother me. Idle always had a tendency for over acting, and much like kids’ movies, there is more leeway for such a thing in children’s audiobooks. It kept me on my toes in a good way.
Hodge can also be agile with his vocal delivery, but he transitioned better when he switched from one character to another.
Again, half a point is rewarded to both!
6. Volume:
The only real complaint I have with Idle’s performance is that he can be too abrupt with his volume. At one moment, he could be whispering, and then in the next, he was practically shouting at the top of his lungs. I had to adjust the volume multiple times because of this.
On the other hand, I didn’t have to tweak the volume as much when Hodge was narrating. He would take his time from being quiet to being loud, and still retain that vocal balance to refrain the listener from adjusting the volume constantly.
So, the point goes to Hodge!
7. Willy Wonka:
Idle vocally embodies Wonka with what readers would expect – an eccentric and highly imaginative fellow who would prefer to be around children than grownups despite some of their flaws. I am perfectly fine with this since Idle has a natural affinity for Wonka’s mannerisms.
Hodge voices Wonka in a similar fashion, but despite his efforts of creating his own spin, I gravitated towards Idle’s performance more.
Last point goes to Idle!
Now! Here are the final scores:
Idle: 4
Hodge: 3
It was a close race, but both narrators did a great job with the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory audiobook. I can imagine how difficult it is recording an audiobook, and I applaud anybody who does it for a living. In this instance, both Idle and Hodge did a good job with the source material that they were given, but ultimately, it was Idle’s vocal delivery as well as the subtler differences in some of his accents that made him stand out more than Hodge.
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!
The Bouncer Book Review

I came across The Bouncer by David Gordon in a very interesting way. I was processing books one day when I discovered this title. Initially, I didn’t think much of it until I saw one of the advanced praises on the back. It used the words “comic-thriller.” I had never seen a book described in that way before. Now that I’ve had the chance to read it, it was worth it to a certain degree.
The Bouncer revolves around an average Dostoevsky-reading, Harvard-expelled strip club bouncer with a highly classified military history named Joe Brody and a cast of colorful characters. These include Gio Caprisi – Brody’s best friend, strip joint owner, and head mafioso who dresses like a female dominatrix – and Donna Zamora – a FBI agent and single mother who’s stuck manning the bureau’s information hotline. These and others collide in a variety of situations like a crackdown on Gio’s strip joint, a back-road gun show intervention, and a perfume heist.
At first, I thought the story would be more like ha-ha funny because the novel tended to promote its comedy side. However, the more I read it, I realized that it had more British-like humor, as in dry and sarcastic. I didn’t mind that because it immediately made me think of films like the Ocean series due to their blend of humor, crime, and thrill. In fact, I think a lot of the jokes could play out better if the novel was adapted into a movie. I hope it does since the book feels very much like a film, especially the fight scenes. The final one between Brody and Adrian – a domestic terrorist – went on so long that I thought that it would outlast the one in The Quiet Man.
I also enjoyed how fast paced it was. A lot of the chapters were pretty short and filled with action. This is especially good for people who are reading it before they go to bed.
A lot of the characters are developed when needed. I do not mean that they are one-dimensional. I simply noticed that the characters were only developed when the plot called for it. For example, in the beginning, it is revealed that a minor Korean character is getting married soon, but he winds up dead within the next 5 chapters after getting involved in the gun heist. If this was a standalone, I would have a problem with this, but I don’t because Gordon released a sequel to The Bouncer called The Hard Stuff in 2019, so I expect more character development.
Now when I mentioned that I thought that it was worth it to a certain degree, the main reason why I said that is because some of the characters and subplots got in the way of the main story. For example, the whole subplot of Gio dressing up as a female dominatrix with his wife suspecting him of doing something shadier was far more unnecessary than intended. It took up a few more chapters than other subplots, and there was no payoff, which irked me the most. It’s like Gordon is trying to slam almost everything crime movie trope into the book. I hope The Hard Stuff scales this back.
All in all, The Bouncer by David Gordon was mostly worth it. It’s a fast-paced, action-packed heck of a novel that evokes heist films like the Ocean series. The overuse of subplots and characters may detract from the overall enjoyment depending on how the reader reacts to them. I would recommend this book to those who like humor-based crime novels and movies. I liked The Bouncer so much that my profile picture for the website contains it and that I immensely look forward to reading The Hard Stuff soon.
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!
Movie Reviews From the Vault: Where’d You Go Bernadette

This week’s Book Reviews From the Vault will be different as I will be reviewing the movie version of Where’d You Go Bernadette. After 10 months of release delays, my book club was able to see it around this time last year. Was it worth it? Let’s find out!
WARNING: THIS REVIEW WILL CONTAIN SPOILERS!
About two weeks ago, I saw Where’d You Go Bernadette with some members of the book club that I facilitate. We had been looking forward to seeing it ever since we heard the announcement that book by Maria Semple was going to be turned into a film last year. After 10 months of release delays, I felt that the movie was worth the wait even with its differences from the book since it stuck to the core of the story.
Directed by Richard Linklater, Where’d You Go Bernadette is about a woman who was once a famous architect. After years of sacrificing her career to take care of her husband and daughter, she tries to reconnect with her creativity by going an adventure that makes her and her family realize her truth worth.
For those who are familiar with the book, it is easy to see the shift in perspective. The novel focuses more on Bernadette’s daughter Bee as she tries to find her mom through various letters and documents. In contrast, the movie emphasizes the title character so much that its opening scene actually reveals where she had gone to. In other words, a more accurate title for the film version of Where’d You Go Bernadette is What Made You Go Here Bernadette. Say what you want about that, but I did not have a problem with that because the film shows what led the titular character to go on her journey straight from the horse’s mouth. Letters and documents can only reveal so much.
Another major difference between the book and the movie is the absence or reduction of some subplots in the latter. The subplots that were eliminated were Elgie – Bernadette’s workaholic techie husband – getting his secretary Soo-Lin pregnant – and Audrey – Bernadette’s “nemesis” – getting in trouble at the hotel that she stays at after the blackberry incident. Even though I did not mind them in the book, I was glad that Linklater did away with them. They made the plot more complicated than it should be, especially the Elgie/Soo-Lin saga. Elgie is a good husband to Bernadette and tries to help, yet he simply does not realize how creatively deprived she is. Additionally, the subplot of Bee going to Choate – a prestigious boarding school – is reduced in the movie. In the book, Bee eventually goes to Choate, yet because of her mom’s disappearance, she becomes so depressed that it affects her attitude and grades. While it does add some nuance to her relationship to Bernadette, it again makes the story far more complicated than necessary. That is why in the movie, Bee simply does not want to go after some careful consideration.
The primary complaints about the movie revolve around three things that I am not bothered by: the pacing, Linklater’s creativity, and the fake YouTube documentary. To begin with, reviewers quibble about how slow it was in the beginning. I personally did not mind this because a good chunk of it shows how eccentric Bernadette can be, the bond between her and Bee, and her relationship to other people. Moreover, people seem to agree that this is Linklater’s least creative effort. I understand where they are coming from since he directed Boyhood, which was shot over a 12-year period, and he plans to do the same thing for the movie adaptation of Merrily We Roll Along, just over a 20-year period. To them, Where’d You Go Bernadette is not the most ground-breaking film from him. Maybe it comes from the fact that I have not seen his other films, but I am not worked up by this because there is a lot of pressure to be creative in Hollywood. It is fine to do something simple every now and then. Plus, there is something quite innovative in Bernadette, and that is the faux YouTube documentary. The video serves as exposition for Bernadette’s architectural career, but people have complained about how it felt like they were in another movie while watching that part. I admire the documentary’s authenticity, yet at times, the main film can lose itself through this video. Despite that, it knows when to get back to the main story.
Nevertheless, the one main problem that I have with this movie is how everything is neatly resolved. Conflicts like the one between Bernadette and Audrey are naturally played out, yet they are solved when the script calls for it. Hollywood has always done this, so that does not annoy me. What irritates me is that the main story is supposed to be necessarily complicated. The reality is that not every problem is neatly tied up like strings on a present.
Overall, despite its alterations from the book, the movie version of Where’d You Go Bernadette is still good and faithful to the novel, for it focuses on the main story. I would recommend watching the film to anyone who is interested, especially to people who have read the book. Not every movie that is based on a novel is going to be 100% faithful, but as long as one sticks to the core of the story, films like Where’d You Go Bernadette are worth watching.
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!
We Need to Talk About Kevin Book Review

Warning: The book that I am about to review deals with school shootings.
Even though I am aware that not every book will appeal to everyone, readers have a tendency to step out of their comfort zone once in a great while in order expand their mindsets. Some might enjoy a novel so much that they would like to read more books similar to that. Others might not like it, or they may have a hard time reading it. No one can blame them for that. I read We Need to Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver (a female author) recently, and even though I thoroughly enjoyed it, I can certainly see all three sides of this debate.
We Need to Talk About Kevin is about fictional school shooting around the same time as the Columbine High School massacre. Through a series of letters to her husband, Eva Khatchadourian – the teenage killer’s mother – tries to figure out why her son killed 9 people and what made him that way.
As seen in the summary, it deals with a very touchy subject. Just this alone might turn people off from reading it. However, Shriver treats this topic in a non-sugarcoated manner. As seen in my Turtles All the Way Down and The Survivors Club reviews, it’s the best way to deal with sensitive issues due to their sheer honesty. Throughout the novel, Eva harbors suspicions of Kevin’s behavior since he was born, but then again, she was not exactly keen on being a mother either. In addition, there’s a possibility that his killing spree clouded her perspective. Without this level of frankness, the novel would not have a realistic portrayal of what led to the school shooting.
Additionally, a lot of readers had some strong opinions about Eva. Many of them believed that she was so self-centered and egotistical that they didn’t care what happened to her. But then again, the book clouds the debate between nature versus nurture, unlike The Bad Seed by William March, which rules in favor of the former over the latter. On one hand, as Kevin got older, he adopts some of the same demeanor as Eva. On the other hand, Eva didn’t pay that much attention to her son and continuously suspected him of committing horrendous actions like pouring a cleaning product onto Celia’s – his sister’s – eye. She may have possibly drunk a little more wine than usual when she was pregnant with him, and she definitely overreacted to some of his behavior when he was a child like the scene in the restaurant. It does not help that Franklin – Eva’s husband – constantly comes to Kevin’s defense with a “boys will be boys” mentality and does not discipline him. I don’t exactly like her as a person, but I felt a lot of her frustrations. And, that’s one of the beauties of reading books; they allow people to empathize with characters that they wouldn’t normally like. At the same time, one has to ask if Kevin would’ve turned out the same way if Eva was a loving mother.
Another complaint that I have seen about this book is that the ending was predictable. I didn’t really think it was that foreseeable since it came as such a shock to me. However, when Franklin gives Kevin a crossbow for Christmas, I can see how some readers put the two together.
I listened to the audiobook, which is narrated by one of the most popular and award-winning narrators in the United States – Barbara Rosenblatt. Along with recording audiobooks like Bridget Jones’s Diary, Rosenblatt has also originated the role of Mrs. Medlock in the musical version of The Secret Garden and has acted in shows like Law and Order: SVU and Orange is the New Black (the latter as Miss Rosa). After hearing her on We Need to Talk About Kevin, I can see why she received all those praises. Rosenblatt’s interpretation of a variety of characters including Eva, Franklin, and Kevin served as the highlight of the audiobook. She plays Eva with pure bluntness and great sarcasm, and when she has to be vulnerable, she goes all the way. It’s through this performance that made me feel for Eva even if others didn’t. The narrator gives Franklin the voice of a dad from the 1950s, which falls in line with his “boys will be boys” mindset, even though I noticed that she uses that same tone with some of the minor male characters. The best of all was her vocalization of Kevin, which oozed slime and a psychopathic vibe. It undoubtedly made me fear for Eva because I wondered how long he would torment her, especially when he eventually gets out of prison.
We Need to Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver is a book that’s not for everyone. The subject matter and the character of Eva will be off putting to some readers. On the contrary, the novel refuses to soften the subject matter, and Eva is such a multi-dimensional character. This would be the part where I recommend it to certain groups, but all I have to say is give this book a try, and if one doesn’t like it, I completely understand.
Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!