Lily’s Wondrous World: A Day in the Park Book Review

Full disclosure: I was given an ARC of this book from Stress Free Book Marketing in exchange for an honest review.

This year has another first. A type of book that I haven’t reviewed on this website is the picture book. I read a lot of them when I was a Children’s Librarian, but I didn’t have the time to review them. Nonetheless, I’m glad to check picture books off the list. Which one is the first to be reviewed on this website? That’s Lily’s Wondrous World: A Day in the Park by Marc Polett and illustrated by Vasya Baev – a cute and fun picture book that embraces nature in many ways.

Lily’s Wondrous World: A Day in the Park is the first of a four-part series starring Lily and her animal friends. Lily is a young girl who goes to the park. While there, she meets a rabbit named Benny, a squirrel named Nutty, and a dog named Rusty. Together, they have a lot of fun going on adventures, exploring nature, and building a wonderful bond while in the great outdoors.

Like many picture books, it’s a quick read. It can make a 4- to 8- year old pretty excited to go to the park with its bold and bright illustrations. Baev utilized generative AI tools like Midjourney and Stable Diffusion and blended them in with his artistic abilities. The mix between the two feels natural. It looks straight out of a Disney Junior show, which is not a bad thing in this case. A simple story like this needs simple designs. My only complaint is that Lily looks embarrassed when the book tells readers that she and her furry friends “are always here with love and joy and laughter and cheer.” 

Other than that, Baev’s visuals perfectly demonstrate the happy and nature-based story.

The characters’ pop out on the page even if they don’t have any other unique traits besides who they are. I like Lily’s look with her red hair and yellow dress. While a girl with that hair color and a yellow ensemble isn’t new (think Madeline), the look along with a Polly Pocket-ponytail still stands out. Her main personality features are that she loves nature and is friendly. Benny, Nutty, and Rusty are animals that one would expect to see in any Disney-related property. They are cute, happy, big-eyed, and not much else. Considering that this is a story about the park and its wondrous things in it, readers will most likely not expect deep characters.

The text is done in rhyme. These are simply ones that detail Lily’s day in the park. They flow very well. Most importantly, they capture the images seen in the picture book effectively. Some adults might wonder where her parents are, but this is not the kind of book for that. Besides, there are people who let their kids go to places by themselves as long as they come home by dinnertime.

Its main strength is the mood. Since it’s about the wondrous world, the park greatly demonstrates that. The book portrays everything about it, including the meadows, the woods, and the creek as if it was a kid’s first time going there. It’s meant to open their eyes to the natural world, which the book succeeds at with an overall happy vibe.

Lily’s Wondrous World: A Day in the Park by Marc Polett and illustrated by Vasya Baev is a delightful picture book about four friends and their time in the park. The visuals and character designs reflect the cheerful mood with its bold, bright, and Disney-esque designs. If one is looking for something deeper, you will not find it here. It’s a simple story about exploring nature. I would recommend it to kids and adults who love the outdoors and bright illustrations. It’s a nice picture book to start out with; I hope to review more in the future.

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

Lie Down in Darkness Book Review

Content warning: this review discusses mental health and racism.

I’ve reviewed a handful of books that many readers would consider to be archaic. They can be considered timeless like A Farewell to Arms and Goodbye, Mr. Chips. Others can be dated to some extent. I’ve talked about both on this website before, yet I’ve never dove into the subject, so I’ll do so with today’s subject Lie Down in Darkness – the 1951 debut novel of William Styron.  It’s a Southern Gothic tale that does well with diving deep into character mindsets, but it’s slightly marred by unnecessary racism.

Lie Down in Darkness is about the Loftis family of Port Warwick, Virginia as they grieve for their daughter Peyton’s death. On the day of their daughter’s funeral, separated couple Milton and Helen Loftis reflect on the betrayals, infidelities, disappointed love, and expectations that led to her suicide. Milton is a man of great charm and infinite weakness, especially for alcohol, while Helen gave all of her love to their physically and mentally disabled daughter Maudie. Peyton is adored by her father and loathed by her mother, and she is ultimately destroyed by that mixed inheritance.

Now, one might think, “Oh, is this another tragedy about a Southern family?”

I can easily see that because the early to mid-twentieth century liked those kinds of stories. They take place in the American South and often focus on family dynamics and the loss of Southern heritage. Examples are books written by William Faulkner as well as movies like Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, A Streetcar Named Desire, and A Summer Place. I especially bring up Faulkner because there are reviews of Lie Down in Darkness that compare Styron to The Sound and the Fury author

Nonetheless, Lie Down in Darkness still stands out in a few ways. For one thing, I liked how the flashbacks jumped back and forth. I was a little confused by this at first, but it made sense because this reflects the parents’, especially Milton’s, state of mind as they grapple with Peyton’s death. While they go through the funeral, both think of what led up to her suicide, which results in the flashbacks. While this isn’t anything new, it’s more realistically executed than say in Goodbye, Mr. Chips.

Another thing that makes it stand out is what separates Milton and Helen. In many stories of this time period, if a marriage is falling apart, it’s usually because of some outside force. For example, the union between Doc and Lola Delaney in the William Inge play Come Back Little Sheba is threatened due to the former’s alcoholism. In Lie Down in Darkness, it starts crumbling after Helen and Milton find out that their eldest daughter Maudie is disabled. This results in the former wanting to take care of her as much as she could, while the latter barely does anything with their daughter and drinks. When Peyton comes around, the opposite occurs. Once Maudie dies (most likely from being too good in that world), they begin to reconcile, but soon after, they are back to being at odds with each other. This ultimately shows that there was something deeper that drove them apart in the end. One character sums it up that Milton has too much love, while Helen doesn’t have enough. Also, the book doesn’t reveal if they got back together in the end, which is a great, realistic touch.

Finally, the novel does a good job with depicting Peyton’s depression. Throughout, she doesn’t get along with Helen because she always felt that the latter didn’t love her for some reason. On top of that, even though she adores her father, once he kisses her at her wedding in a way that makes her uncomfortable, she begins to see him for what he is. Also, there’s a section inserted in the final chapter that portrays the final days of her life. In it, she explains that she feels like her head is underwater. The book doesn’t judge her for feeling that way. She grew up in a household that was full of mixed messages. One parent offers you too much love, while the other doesn’t give enough.  In addition, she is not a saint. Peyton is immature and spoiled, and the novel is fully aware of that. She even ties Maudie up to a tree during their childhood. I’m not surprised that the portrayal of depression is done well because Styron himself would have that during his lifetime. In fact, he wrote about it in his 1989 memoir entitled Darkness Visible: A Memoir of Madness, which is one of his best-known works outside his 1979 novel Sophie’s Choice. It’s a believable portrayal.

Finally, let’s discuss the racism in the book. I get that it takes place in the mid 1940s American South and that the family is an upper-middle class one with two black servants. In many ways, racism informs the privileged environment that they live in, so yes, the mentions of the n-word are to be expected. Money is sometimes talked about since Helen received an inheritance of $20,000 early in her and Milton’s marriage. Also, I understand that Styron had a Northern mother and liberal Southern father, which helped him to understand race relations in the broader sense, but one would not get that while reading Lie Down in Darkness because the black characters that have names and personalities are often portrayed as fat, ugly, primitive, and God-fearing people. And yes, the novel even mentions a group of them eating what else watermelons and chicken. Granted, if these characters existed in real life, they would be racist given the environment that they’re in even though when Peyton marries a Jewish guy, both Milton and Helen think about their prejudice against semitism. Moreover, while being liberal in 1951 is not the same as being so in 2024, the constant use of black stereotypes was still unnecessary, and it slightly ruined the novel for me.

Lie Down in Darkness by William Stryon is both timeless and a product of its time. There will always be tales about family breakdowns, and this is no different. The things that make it stand out are the natural flashbacks, the subversive reason of why the marriage didn’t work, and the realistic depiction of depression. The racism, while reflecting the privileged environment the Loftises live in, threatens to undo what good the novel does. I would recommend it to those who like Southern Gothic novels as well as titles by William Stryon and William Faulkner. On the other hand, I will warn readers about the constant racism and how depressing it can be. Although Lie Down in Darkness is an archaic novel, it’s timeless to a degree.

Before I go, I want to let you all know that the latest episode of the Adapt Me Podcast is out now! Returning guest Zita Short and I discuss how we would adapt this novel. Check it out at this link!

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

A Farewell to Arms: A Rant About the Latest Adaptation

About a month ago, news broke that Tom Blyth, who recently starred in The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes, was cast in an upcoming adaptation of A Farewell to Arms directed by Michael Winterbottom. 

My first reaction to it was simply this.

Source: Vecteezy

Why? I’ve already reviewed two adaptations of the novel by Ernest Hemingway already on this website. They were the 1932 movie starring Gary Cooper and Helen Hayes and the 1957 one with Rock Hudson and Jennifer Jones

Neither were that good. The former was decent, but could’ve been better if director Frank Borzage didn’t show off his skill for the sake of showing off, and the latter was all over the place. 

But, the more I thought about it, the more I understood why A Farewell to Arms would be adapted in the 2020s. First off, there hasn’t been a new version of the story in nearly 60 years. Along with the two aforementioned versions, there has been a 1930 play and a 1966 BBC mini series starring George Hamilton and Vanessa Redgrave, but the latter most likely lost its life to the great BBC wipeout. And if one counts In Love and War – the 1996 film starring Sandra Bullock and Chris O’Donnell that dramatizes the real-life events that inspired the book in the first place, then it would be nearly 30 years since there has been A Farewell to Arms-related content (not counting the numerous references to it like on shows like South Park and Family Guy). Therefore, the time seems right for another adaptation (even if I say this begrudgingly). 

Second, there have been an influx of war-related movies that have come out within the last 10 years. These include 1917 and the 2022 Netflix adaptation of All Quiet on the Western Front. In fact, the 1932 version of A Farewell to Arms was released two years after the latter original film. So if we have another adaptation of All Quiet on the Western Front in the future, then another one of A Farewell to Arms is bound to happen. 

Third, of all the novels that Hemingway wrote, A Farewell to Arms is one of his best known. Say what you want about the man, the myth, the guy who shoves his masculinity down your throat, he knew how to write stories like a timeless wartime romance. It’s not perfect by any means, yet it taps into the doom of the relationship, the power dynamics, and how war can be boring. The fact that it still resonates with people today enough to make another adaptation certainly demonstrates its cultural footprint in literature and in Hollywood. On top of that, another movie based on a Hemingway novel Across the River and into the Trees starring Liev Schreiber premiered at the Sun Valley Film Festival in 2022 with an anticipated release in the United States this year. With that being said, we might see a revival of Hemingway adaptations this decade if both A Farewell to Arms and Across the River and into the Trees do well.

Since the Michael Winterbottom version is set to start filming in Italy later this year, there are some things that I would like to see in order to make it truly work. To begin with, there has to be a constant reminder of war while the romance between Frederick and Katherine blossoms. In both the 1932 and 1957 versions, there was always a separation between the two with the love being at one place while the battles at another physical location. At times, this makes them feel like two separate flicks combined into one. The best wartime romances blend the two aspects together. Look at Casablanca as an example. The affair between Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman only occurs when the latter’s character comes to Casablanca with her husband in order to fly safely to Lisbon and escape the Nazis. The Nazis are everywhere in Casablanca from the streets to the cafe that Bogart’s character runs. If the Michael Winterbottom adaptation is able to achieve the marriage between love and war, then it will be on the right track.

Another element that I would love to see happen is the mundanity of war. Hemingway includes several descriptions of the Italian landscapes and what Frederick does to show how the character distracts himself from how bored he feels while on the front. Most importantly, Frederick sustains his injury while eating cheese. If that’s not the least inspiring way to get hurt, then I don’t know what is. Combined with newfound love for Katherine and the sense of danger while he’s in the war, this eventually propels him to desert the war entirely. The 1932 version does a better job demonstrating this than the 1957 one with showing Gary Cooper looking disinterested while in the ambulance in the opening scene and how it depicts the bit in which Frederick gets blown up albeit in a cheesy way.

Given the war movies and video games that have come in the last 10 years, they have made battle look cool and fun. I’m afraid that this version might fall into that trap to appeal to the aesthetics of similar portrayals. Granted, many of those depictions are realistic with the amount of blood and dirt on the soldiers’ faces as well as limbs being blown off, but the point of A Farewell to Arms was to display the less exciting side of war that’s full of waiting and strategizing. 

One other facet that should be present in this version is the chemistry between the leads. Blyth and whoever is cast as Katherine should have chemistry because the romance between their characters is the core relationship in the novel. If they do, then it will sell the movie. This was present between Cooper and Hayes in the 1932 film, but not between Hudson and Jones in the 1957 one.

The final feature that I would love to see is not including everything that happens in the book. This is a problem specifically to adaptations of novels by authors who tend to add fluff to a bare bones story. Some screenwriters have been under the impression that they need to include every word no matter how pointless it is to the plot. This is especially egregious when it comes to adapting any Hemingway story (I’m looking at you For Whom the Bell Tolls the movie). That author even coined the phrase “iceberg theory” to show how a writer has to keep it simple. In the articles I’ve read about the new version, Winterbottom makes comments about that theory and how he wants to pare it down to the bare bones to capture the Hemingway spirit. Let’s hope he put those words into action.

The 1932 version of A Farewell to Arms does this best by condensing everything around the romance. If Winterbottom maintains the base of that flick while working on his version, it will work. Also, I’ll give him brownie points if he includes a reference to the weird puppet transition that occurs in the older one.

All in all, while I’m not crazy about a new adaptation of A Farewell to Arms, it can be effective as long as it follows the four aspects I’ve pointed out in this essay. It needs to blend the war and romance in a realistic manner, depict war in a more humdrum manner, have chemistry between its leads, and above all, condense the story. If it does all that, then it might be the best adaptation of a Hemingway novel ever. This would be a monstrous feat because his books still overshadow their film versions to this day. I wish the cast and crew of this adaptation the best of luck.

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

Our History Has Always Been Contraband: In Defense of Black Studies Book Review

Full disclosure: I was given a copy of this book from Coriolis Company in exchange for an honest review.

Ever since I read White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism by Robin DiAngelo, I have been seeking out resources and stories regarding racism and the marginalized experience. I’ve always been interested in history, especially in areas that aren’t as well known. Black history in the United States is a great example because of the controversy surrounding the teaching of it in schools. One year ago this week, the State of Florida banned them from instructing students in a newly created advanced placement course in African American Studies. Colin Kaepernick, Robin D. G. Kelley, and Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor address this particular issue in today’s book Our History Has Always Been Contraband: In Defense of Black Studies with powerful readings and essays that effectively tie in past and present struggles with educating people on this subject.

Our History Has Always Been Contraband: In Defense of Black Studies brings together important texts that demonstrate the importance of learning said topic in the United States. These include literature, political theory, law, psychology, sociology, gender and sexuality studies, queer and feminist theory, and history. Many works are present like those by Frederick Douglass, Zora Neale Hurston, W.E.B. Du Bois, James Baldwin, Angela Y. Davis, Octavia Butler, Ta-Nehisi Coates, and bell hooks. The book also contains original essays written by the editors detailing how we got here and pieces by Brea Baker, Marlon Williams-Clark, and Roderick A. Ferguson elucidating on how we can fight back. They illuminate the ways that we can collectively work towards freedom for all in a multitude of ways like abolition, feminism, racial justice, economic empowerment, self-determination, desegregation, decolonization, reparations, queer liberation, and cultural and artistic expression.

The book is divided into three parts: How We Got Here, The History They Don’t Want You To Know, and How We Fight Back. Now, let’s get one thing out of the way. When one hears the name Colin Kaepernick, one might think, “Oh, is that the guy who knelt at the NFL games to protest the oppression of black people?”

Yes, it is that man, and some people will have certain opinions about him. One must set aside their feelings about Kaepernick while reading the preface to this book. It’s the only time in which he writes about something. In it, he summarizes the entire premise of the book with a calm and steady tone while expressing anger at what Florida has been doing to suppress black history in schools. A book about taking action to educate people on black history needs someone like Kaepernick, who has consistently fought for equity in that area. 

That preface sets up Part 1. It contains articles by Robin D.G. Kelley and Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor that explain the politics behind “forbidding” people from learning Black Studies since the late 1960s. This includes misinterpretations of critical race theory and attacking antiracism. Reading this section started off slow, but it packs in a lot of history within 20 pages. It effectively establishes how Black Studies became so “controversial.”

Part 2 encompasses the majority of the book. Some of the readings are by people that a general audience will more than likely know, while others are probably unknown. The editors selected a wide range of work to show the history that mainstream America doesn’t want people to know written by black people from all walks of life, including the LGBTQIA community. These essays act as a starter kit for those who are interested in learning more about Black Studies because they are powerful pieces that need to be read. “The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro” excerpt by Frederick Douglass lays down the frustration of many black people as to why they didn’t feel free on Independence Day, and he delivered that speech in 1852. Reading it made me realize why many still express similar sentiments over 170 years later, especially with the line, “There is not a nation on this very earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of the United States, at this very hour”(p. 30).

Another eye-opening passage was “The Propaganda of History” excerpt from Black Reconstruction in America by W.E.B. Du Bois. In it, Du Bois argues that the teaching and learning of history are often used as a tool to defend the status quo. To prove this, he used the work of a woman named Helen Broadman. She studied school textbooks at the time and noted three dominant themes: all black people were ignorant; all were lazy, dishonest, and extravagant; and they were responsible for bad government during Reconstruction (p.44-47). To anyone who actually studied that period in history, none of those assertions are true. This rightfully riled me up.

Other readings that stood out were Octavia Butler’s essay, “The Lost Races of Science Fiction” (1980) and Sami Schalk’s “Introduction: Black Health Matters” from the book Black Disability Politics (2022). The former touches on why marginalized characters are mostly absent in a literary genre that allows authors to use their imagination as to what the future would look like. In fact, Butler asks readers this question, “Are minority characters – black characters in this case – so disruptive a force that the mere presence of one alters a story, focuses it on race rather than whatever the author had in mind?” (p. 81).

The answer is simply yes “if the creators of those characters are too restricted in their thinking to visualize blacks in any other context” (p. 81). In other words, Butler asserts that authors need to expand their mindsets in order to represent marginalized characters in non-stereotypical ways.

The latter discusses Black disability studies, specifically black disabled people’s relationship with race and ability as well as how impairment has been understood in black communities. For example, Schalk discusses the notion that African-American folks have distanced themselves from the concept of disability and identifying as such. She cites Douglas Baynton’s article “Disability and the Justification of Inequality in American History” to show that minority groups had disability discourses thrusted upon them “as justification for their exclusion from full rights and citizenship.” As a result, Baynton argues, “these groups distanced themselves from disability as a means of accessing certain rights and freedoms” and passively accepted that “disability is a justifiable rationale for discrimination and exclusion” (p. 150). 

Even though how black people interact with disability has evolved, especially when considering the black disability studies framework, it makes sense with how being disabled would’ve been seen as another whammy for a community already struggling to obtain representation and respect. On a personal note, I was teased and bullied by some of the black kids at school because of how socially awkward I was, including one that outright said, “I don’t get along with disabled people.”

That and other readings helped me to open my eyes to the struggles of teaching Black Studies.

Finally, Part 3 offers solutions that involve some form of communal and direct action. In her essay, “When Black Studies is Contraband, We Must Be Outlaws,” Brea Baker encourages readers to engage in civil disobedience like organizing rallies, school walk-outs, and teach-ins; reading banned books; and calling out the system that’s designed to keep marginalized groups in their place in order to bring about a more just future (p. 155-158). Marlon Williams-Clark, author of the article, “History Is a Beautiful, Ugly Story, and We Must Teach It” proclaims that to teach Black history accurately, “we must be honest about ourselves and talk about values; values shape what one thinks is important to preserve” (p. 161).

This even means accepting different perspectives of American history, no matter how ugly and horrible it can get. Solutions like these are realistic given today’s circumstances. 

Our History Has Always Been Contraband: In Defense of Black Studies edited by Colin Kaepernick, Robin D. G. Kelley, and Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor is a highly important anthology aimed at readers who want to understand the urgency to teach that subject. While it’s basically a starter kit, it contains some of the most important essays that effectively drive home the point for the need to educate people in Black studies and history as well as to take action. I would highly recommend it to history and social studies teachers as well as to those interested in learning more about these topics. Books like this one definitely take people, who are looking to get more involved in black activism, into the right direction.

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

Death in a Gilded Frame Book Review

Full disclosure: I was given an ARC of this book from Stress Free Book Marketing in exchange for an honest review.

I’ve read a handful of mysteries, but there is one type that I haven’t covered yet: the historical mystery. These are ones that are set in the past, and historical context plays some role in the narrative. The best ones tend to be those that are thoroughly researched while still keeping readers guessing on the mystery. Today’s subject Death in a Gilded Frame by Cecelia Tichi is a clear-cut historical mystery. Does it fulfill its duty? While it’s not perfect, it does a good job with both aspects.

Death in a Gilded Frame is the sixth book in the Val and Roddy DeVere Gilded Age Series. It’s the Summer of 1899, and wealthy people and families are going to Newport, Rhode Island for the yachts and balls. Most importantly, there are famed artists that are eager to paint the portraits of the Society’s “Queens.” Western silver heiress Val Mackle DeVere agrees to sit for one for her husband Roddy, yet she discovers an art gallery manager screaming in silence while his hands clutch the gilt frame that’s pulled down over his head and shoulders, and blood soaks his cream-colored suit. Instinctively, Val reaches for the murder weapon, and as a result, she will find herself suspected, shamed, and shunned from Newport society as she tries to find the actual killer.

Tichi is not only a writer, but also a Professor of English and American Studies Emerita at Vanderbilt University. She has penned several books about the Gilded Age ranging from What Would Mrs. Astor Do?: The Essential Guide to the Manners and Mores of the Gilded Age to Gilded Age Cocktails: History, Lore, and Recipes from America’s Golden Age. In addition, other titles in the Val and Roddy DeVere Gilded Age include A Gilded Death, A Fatal Gilded High Note, A Deadly Gilded Free Fall, A Gilded Drowning Pool, and Murder, Murder, Murder in Gilded Central Park. Can you tell that she loves writing about the Gilded Age?

For those who aren’t familiar with that era, it’s the period between 1870 and 1914 that saw rapid economic growth in American history. This resulted in people who didn’t necessarily come from wealth becoming so. Tichi paints the Gilded Age beautifully and realistically. She establishes Newport as the go-to place for high society with all of its riches and snobbery. Cornelius Vanderbilt was right when he said, “No city on earth is as hostile to outsiders as Newport.” 

Old money families are favored the most, while new money folks like Val can be tolerated as long as they learn to fit in. This establishes the personal conflict that she has throughout the story. I don’t know if this was present in the other books, but it feels like a running theme throughout the series.

I also like the characters. Val and her husband Roderick aka Roddy are an odd couple. While Val is from the West and an heiress of a silver mining business, Roddy is from the East and comes from generational wealth. Additionally, she is progressive in her politics, especially when it comes to women’s rights, but she can be impulsive. On the other hand, Roddy is more conservative and rational. Despite all of their opposites, they love each other and are able to work together to solve various cases, including the one in Death in a Gilded Frame. This is a realistic marriage that I wish more books would explore.

Another standout character is Cassie. She is Val’s best friend who has the ability to sense danger whenever she has her premonitions. Cassie is going through her own issue of trying to conceal her skill because people don’t understand it. She’s like Elsa from Frozen in that way. I would love to see her get more character development in future stories.

In addition, there were cameos from real-life historical figures. They included people like Alva Belmont – the first wife of William Kissam Vanderbilt – and Ellen Terry – a famous English actress at the time. Although they barely had an impact on the plot, these appearances were done tastefully in a way that I had to look them up to see if they were real. Again, I wouldn’t be shocked if this too was a present factor in the series.

As for the mystery of who killed Warren Eccles – the gallery manager, it was effective. It has good pacing in revealing the case’s developments. Also, it does a great job of keeping the readers on their toes on who the culprit is. I didn’t know who it was until the very end, and once I did, what Val does is extremely satisfying. Val does a lot of the sleuthing in this book, but I would’ve loved to see Roddy do some too. There are passages where he talks about going to the Reading Room – a gentleman’s club in Newport – to interview some of the members about what they know, but most of that happens off page.

A unique aspect to this series is that they include cocktail recipes. Since Roddy is a mixologist as well as a lawyer, the book includes ones for three different drinks. These are for a Martini (Dry), The Anticipation, and a Soda Cocktail. People will have to read the book in order to find out what the second one contains. This doesn’t shock me because Tichi had previously written two books about cocktail recipes in the Jazz and Gilded Ages. Not only does this provide a quirky component to the series, but also it elevates Roddy from being the stereotypical 19th century wealthy man.

My only complaint about the book is about the framing. The art frame looks stunning, but it’s the figurative one I have an issue with. Val gets accused of murdering Eccles after she’s seen holding the bloody knife by the body. I felt sorry for her as she dealt with the cruel high society making jokes about her supposed involvement. She even calls Roddy out for not helping her when a man compares her to Lady Macbeth, and she tries very hard not to punch people after making those insults. At the same time, I couldn’t help but notice that she brought it upon herself due to her impulsiveness. One would think that after 5 cases, Val would’ve known not to pick up the murder weapon when coming upon a crime scene for the first time. Even Roddy says, “Don’t.” 

I guess Tichi added that in to give the Newport society a legitimate reason to force Val into the spotlight, yet it could’ve been more in line with her work as well as her character.

All in all, Death in a Gilded Frame by Cecelia Tichi is a highly enjoyable historical mystery. The main characters Val and Roddy are realistic, both as individuals and as a couple. Also, the novel portrayed 1899 Newport sensibly, and the mystery kept me on my toes. I would recommend this to readers who love whodunits, especially ones that are set in the past and contain female detectives, as well as, you guessed it, the Gilded Age! The book is out now, so have a Gilded time while reading Death in a Gilded Frame.

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

Top 3 Best and Worst Books* of 2023

Hi Everybody!!

While today is not quite the last Monday, the next two are Christmas and New Year’s Day. This means that I’ll be off for the next two weeks, so this will mark the last post of the year! Let’s celebrate it with the 4th annual year-end countdown of books* I reviewed in 2023!

*This also includes movies.

Like before, I’ll pick 6 titles for this list – 3 for the best and 3 for the worst! Now, I have only one question for you!

I sure am! Let’s get started with the Best Books of 2023!

This year I read a lot of 5-star books and watched many 5-star movies. This made it pretty difficult to choose which ones were the very best. All of them were in a variety of genres. But at the end of the day, I had to narrow down the best list to 3 of those titles, which I’d love to show all of you now.

3. Late Bloomer: Finding My Authentic Self at Midlife by Melissa Giberson

There are plenty of stories of people discovering themselves at a later age, but Late Bloomer: Finding My Authentic Self at Midlife by Melissa Giberson stands out for its sheer rawness and honesty. Melissa is fully aware that she’s not a perfect human being, and she tries her hardest to keep some form of normalcy within her family after she realizes that she’s a lesbian. And yet, things don’t work out that way. On top of that, she has to reconcile her sexuality with her husband, kids, and Jewish faith. In addition, she can be funny, which certainly balances out the times where she experiences her low points. It’s a fantastic memoir and can be read by anybody regardless of sexuality, age, and faith!

2. The War That Saved My Life by Kimberly Brubaker Bradley

Even though I’m no longer a Children’s Librarian, I still love to read juvenile literature simply because they can be deep and simple. The War That Saved My Life by Kimberly Brubaker Bradley is a great example of that. While it’s basically a story of a girl overcoming struggles of having a clubfoot while being displaced in World War II, it contains a lot of layers. Many characters are morally grey instead of black and white. Caregiver Susan claims that she’s not a nice person, yet she ends up being one, and obviously, Ada is a flawed child who has a hard time trusting others due to trauma inflicted by her truly awful mother. It even has a interesting way of dealing with lies and liars. What makes this book truly work is that it primarily focuses on Ada gaining strength to face her fears, combat prejudice, and develop trust with others. It does these things in realistic ways, while constantly reminding the audience of the historic backdrop. This novel is a great historical fiction novel for kids, and a perfect representation of the serious titles that I read for this website!

1. Dog Man by Dav Pilkey

If The War That Saved My Life represents the best of the serious books that I’ve read, then Dog Man by Dav Pilkey symbolizes the silly side. This was the funniest title that I’ve read this year. It captures the active imaginations of 7-8 years old in the best way possible ranging from the illustrations to the situations Dog Man finds himself in. I still smile anytime I think about how Petey the cat tries to eliminate all text from every book in order to make people dumb and how the hot dog wieners attempt to cause trouble despite their size. I also appreciate how Pilkey manages to find some time to make fun of those who object to filth in books. No matter how silly the plots may be, it fully commits. It’s completely understandable as to why this has spawn many other titles in the series, which I hope to cover each one in the future!

Before, we get to the worst list, I want to mention that the chosen titles bothered me for one main reason: they all try to distinguish themselves with the story they are telling, but they fall flat on their faces to various degrees

Now that we got that out of the way, it’s now time to get to the Top 3 Worst Books* of 2023!

3. Goodbye, Mr. Chips 1969 Movie

I spend the first half of this year analyzing every adaptation of the novella Goodbye, Mr. Chips by James Hilton. While they weren’t the greatest pieces of media on the planet, they had a lot of good elements that helped to enhance the book. The 1969 movie musical contained a lot of changes to the story in order to make it stand out, especially from the faithful 1939 version, but they don’t really work. I go into a lot of detail as to why, but the main problem is that it’s a musical. I still wonder why the writers and producers thought that a story about an old English schoolmaster looking back on his life should have music and lyrics. Songwriter Leslie Bricusse is capable of musicalizing books (Scrooge and Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory are great examples), but the songs overall needed more oomph and less generic lyrics.

Despite the problems, it still succeeds to some degree. Some of the tunes are catchy, and musical numbers like “London is London” and “Schooldays” are well executed. Moreover, the scene in which Mr. Chips finds out that Catherine died remains the best interpretation of that story beat from the novella. Also, I may have been a little harsh on director Herbert Ross. After all, it was his first movie, and he was figuring this out even though some of his choices are flat out strange. He would go on to make films like The Goodbye Girl, The Turning Point, and most importantly, the original Footloose. Basically, he directed flicks with lots of romance and dancing! The point is that Goodbye, Mr. Chips 1969 movie is a misguided attempt to be different from the previous adaptation. Maybe one day, there could be an adaptation set to music, but it needs to be in better hands.

2. A Farewell to Arms 1957 Movie

If the 1969 version of Goodbye, Mr. Chips tries to stand out from the original movie by being different from the source material to some degree, then the 1957 adaptation of A Farewell to Arms attempts to do this in the opposite direction. It’s even more faithful to the novel of the same name by Ernest Hemingway than the 1932 film is. However, it falls flat on its face because it fails to understand how to adapt that author in the first place. It drags out almost every moment from the novel because it wants to capture every possible word that Hemingway wrote, yet it’s not the worst example of this. Furthermore, there are weak lead performances, sudden tonal changes, and desperate attempts to be Gone With the Wind without understanding why that movie worked in the first place.

It does have some interesting supporting performances from Mercedes McCambridge (aka the lady who voiced the demonic Linda Blair in The Exoricst (1973)), Elaine Strich, and Vittorio de Sica. However, they don’t really overcome the main problems of the flick. It’s just another bloated movie produced by David O’Selznick. Even though the 1932 version isn’t particular great, it understands that the core is the romance between a soldier and a nurse and that everything else is fluff. Also, it contains striking images even if they don’t enhance the story. The 1957 one does not. News broke within the last two weeks that Tom Blyth from The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes movie was cast as Frederick Henry in another adaption of A Farewell to Arms this time to be directed by Michael Winterbottom. And, it’s set to start filming late next year. I hope that version isn’t as bloated as and better the comprehends the story than the 1957 one ever did.

1. The Flight of Celestial Race Horses by Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow

The Flight of Celestial Race Horses by Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow is so bad that it’s hilarious. Berdimuhamedow tries to present himself as a strong man to the people of Turkmenistan when he was the dictator (uh, I mean president) by protecting the national horse, the Akhal-Teke. Yet, he does this with what is essentially a picture book filled with poorly photoshopped Akhal-Tekes and passages that imply he wants to have sex with them. It doesn’t help that the text is mostly garbled that I had to read it out loud. Granted, that may be due to translation; I’m not entirely sure. The biggest kicker is there is no self awareness. It’s disturbing to some degree, but to me, this makes it even funnier. Because of this clumsy propaganda, I can’t take Berdimuhamedow seriously. If I get executed for criticizing The Flight of Celestial Race Horses, I won’t regret it at all.

And that was the Top 3 Best and Worst Books* of 2023! I hope all of you enjoyed it. I look forward to having plenty of new reviews for 2024! See you next year!

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator – Audiobook Narrator Edition – Eric Idle vs. Douglas Hodge

Over three years ago, I reviewed two Charlie and the Chocolate Factory audiobooks. One was narrated by Eric Idle, and the other was done by Douglas Hodge. I had such a fun time analyzing their narrations of the same story that today, I’m going to do the same thing, but with the 1972 sequel Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator by Roald Dahl. Coincidentally enough, Idle and Hodge narrated the two separate audiobooks, so it’s a rematch between the Nudge Nudge guy and the guy who played Alfred Pennyworth in Joker (2019)!

Before I get started, I need to get something off my chest. I struggled to figure out the point of Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator storywise. It has little to do with the chocolate factory and the events that took place in the prior book. It’s as if Dahl wrote the sequel due to 1. contractual obligations and/or 2. wanting to deliberately make it unadaptable because of his dissatisfaction with the movie Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. Nonetheless, it was enjoyable to a degree because of the situations Wonka, Charlie, and the latter’s family got into, the locations they went to, and the vocal performances of both Idle and Hodge.

So let’s get started!

1. Charlie Bucket:

Idle still voices Charlie with politeness, but with newfound assertiveness that was mostly absent from the first book. After all, Charlie just received the chocolate factory, and Wonka stressed that he has to show him how to run it. It’s a well deserved improvement.

Meanwhile, with Hodge, Charlie sounds a little more mature. I don’t know if I picked this up while reading Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, but it’s an odd decision given that the events in Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator apparently take place on the same day as the tour of the chocolate factory. Hodge still sounds fine, but I question the decision to make Charlie sound older. 

First point goes to Idle!

2. The Grandparents:

Idle once again channels fellow Monty Python member Michael Palin with his narration as Grandpa Joe. Not much has changed on that front. He gives the rest of the grandparents their own vocal distinctions. Grandpa George is like Joe but with less Palin influence. The grandmothers were my favorite. Grandma Josephine was voiced with a brash,but feminine Yorkshire accent, while Grandma Georgina had a softer tone. 

Once again, Hodge let me down with his performance of grandparents.  His performance as Grandpa Joe didn’t bother me since I got used to the spriteness.  The problem was how the rest of the grandparents sounded almost the same. They all had a similar cranky tone, but I was amused when Hodge voiced Grandma Georgina as even more frail and cantankerous when she ages to 358 years. Like I mentioned in the previous matchup, one of the most important aspects of recording audiobooks is to distinguish each and every character, even if it is very slight. 

To be fair on Hodge’s part, Idle has a whole lot of experience playing older characters, especially the Pepperpots – the old ladies on Monty Python’s Flying Circus.

Idle has another point!

3. Supporting Characters:

With Idle, the American President and his administration had their own versions of the American dialect that British people like to use to mock them. I enjoyed his take on Miss Tibbs as an old, commanding lady. He even does French, Russian, and Chinese accents for characters of those nationalities. The third was pretty cringy.

Speaking of cringe, the Oompa Loompas were improved. Idle developed his flow more, which made their chants feel more like limericks than raps.

Hodge too voiced the American President and his administration with their own kind of American accent that British people use to make fun of them. I especially enjoyed how he portrays the President as the type seen in 1990’s American action movies like Independence Day. He almost sounds like Dean Winters (Mayhem in the Allstate commercials) while voicing that character. The Chinese character was less stereotypical than Idle’s, yet it was still cringe. My only complaint with Hodge in this category is that I wish he would’ve gone further with Miss Tibbs. She barely made an impression with her faint voice.

As for the Oompa Loompas, Hodge demonstrates his great flow when reciting their chants. At various points, it even sounds like they are going to break into song. It was amusing during those sections.

Having evaluated these supporting characters, Hodge finally gets a point.

4. Character Consistency:

As mentioned in the previous review, Idle is known for doing a variety of silly voices throughout his career. It was mostly consistent. Sometimes his English accent slipped while narrating various American characters.

Hodge was also fairly consistent too. He was able to maintain various accents even though again, I wish he would’ve distinguished various supporting characters more.

At this point, I will give both Idle and Hodge half a point each because maintaining the characters’ voices is hard!

So far, here are the scores:

Idle: 2.5

Hodge: 1.5

5. Pacing:

Idle is slower in his narration this time around, but still engaging.

Hodge is still agile with his vocal delivery, and his transitions are still good.

Again, half a point is awarded to both!

6. Volume:

In my previous review, I complained how Idle could be too abrupt with his volume. I don’t know if it’s because Idle quickly learned how to perform in an audio-only environment, the sound mixing was improved, or both. Nevertheless, this is handled much better in this audio version. 

With Hodge’s volume, I’m simply going to repeat what I said in that review because it’s the same evaluation. I didn’t have to tweak the volume as much when Hodge was narrating. He would take his time from being quiet to being loud, and still retain that vocal balance to prevent the listener from adjusting the volume constantly.

So, the point goes to Hodge!

7. Willy Wonka:

Idle vocally embodies Wonka in the same way he did in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory: an eccentric and highly imaginative fellow. Like I said before, I am perfectly fine with this since Idle has a natural affinity for Wonka’s mannerisms.

Hodge voices Wonka in a similar fashion, but I noticed a more sinister element to his interpretation. I don’t know if this was present in the previous audiobook for Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, yet I found it to be intriguing. Despite that, I gravitated towards Idle’s performance because that one was more suited to the story being told.

Last point goes to Idle!

Now! Here are the final scores:

Idle: 4

Hodge: 3

Even though Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator is lackluster compared to its predecessor, Idle and Hodge did a good job with elevating the material to make it their own. It wasn’t that close of a race. Idle had the edge for majority of the time because of his vocal delivery as well as the subtler differences in some of the characters that made him stand out more than Hodge.

Thanks for tuning in for another Audiobook Versus! 

Also, guest Amanda Garrison from the Fictional Hangover Podcast and I cover Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator in the latest episode of the Adapt Me Podcast! It’s out now at this link!

And next week, I will be posting my Top 3 Best and Worst Books I’ve read in 2023, so stay tuned for that!

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

Literary Travel – Cincinnati* Edition

*Ok, my literary travel was technically in Kentucky and Ohio, but they were in the Metro- Northern Kentucky-Cincinnati area.

Hi Everyone!

About three months ago, my husband and I went to Cincinnati, Ohio for his childhood friend’s wedding. We decided to make it a vacation because of neither of us had been there before. We did a bunch of things like go to two book-related places that I want to show you all! All of the photos used were ones that I took.

First up is the Campbell County Public Library, Newport Branch in Newport, Kentucky.

The Campbell County Public Library system was established on September 5, 1978. It’s comprised of four branches – Cold Spring, Carrico/Fort Thomas, Alexandria, and Newport – all in the namesake county as well as three library express locations where patrons can pick up and drop off items in the cities of Melbourne, Silver Grove, and Newport.

We had a lot of time to kill before we went to a welcome party in Covington, so we went to the Newport Branch, which was established on May 16, 2004. We’ll make sure to celebrate its 20th anniversary next year!

When we walked inside, it became clear that it was a fairly simple library. Even though it didn’t have a lot of frills, their organizational skills were through the roof. Everywhere I went contained well-placed and eye-catching signs indicating where what books were located there and what types as well as nice displays. My personal favorites were the easy reader labels for the children’s section. They divided the books into themes like “Concepts,” “Farms,” “Dinosaurs,” etc., with the corresponding image.

The juvenile area also had some beautiful murals, including one that says, “Books are the quietest and consistent of friends.”

In addition, that section even had a dollhouse and a small table, where children could play checkers!

The adult side of the library had a similar organization with its signs and other visual cues to indicate what kind of items they had. For example, their DVD and music CDs sections had color-coded labels showing what genre they were in.

A unique aspect that the library had was the Kentucky Talking Book Library. This provides free library service to those who can’t read traditional print due to visual, physical, or reading disability. They contain audio and Braille materials and are sent to patrons physically or digitally.

Another thing that made the library stand out was that it displayed art made by students at The Children’s Art Academy. It also had an initiative to welcome refugees and immigrants during its Welcome Week, which was to be held later in September. The latter was a collaboration with the Kentucky Refugee Ministries.

When I needed to sit, the there were plenty of chairs (with and without cushions), and they were comfortable. My husband can attest. He was sitting in one of them during the time that I was looking around.

Finally, I appreciated its sense of humor. When we first walked into the library, my husband and I encountered this sign. It was very amusing.

To top that off, their mascot Cam the Library Lion was wearing this for the library’s Summer Reading program.

Overall, even though it wasn’t the flashiest of libraries I’ve been in, I was impressed with the amount of organization. I knew exactly what items were in front of me at all times. Additionally, I appreciate how it tries to actively engage its community in a variety of ways as well as its sense of humor. Along with their website, you can check them out on Facebook and the platform formally known as Twitter!

And now, the second and last book-related of the trip: The Book Bus Depot!

Located in Sharonville, Ohio, it’s a brick and mortar bookstore, where the Book Bus resides. Owner Melanie Moore takes said book bus – a 1962 Volkswagen pickup truck – to various parts of the Cincinnati area to get people interested in reading, especially children. The truck carries tons of books, and there’s a map in the store that shows where it goes. As a former school teacher, Melanie even transfers profits from The Book Bus and “buys new children’s books for low income area schools and organizations to give all children the opportunity to experience the joy of reading.”

On our last day in Cincinnati on a Sunday, my husband and I were lucky to not only see the Book Bus in the flesh, but also to meet various people who review books on Instagram as well as Melanie herself!

The book reviewers at the store were a welcoming community that always absorbs new members no matter where they are. Even one of those bookstagrammers Alyson Wick mentioned later on that they always meet a person who happens to adore books at The Book Bus Depot. You should follow her as well as Alexandra, Becky, Melissa, Jenn, and Rose!

Melanie was a sweet lady, who clearly cares about the importance of reading. She even allows kids to pick out one free book from a special compartment in the check-out desk.

As for the store itself, it only consists of one space, yet it’s spacious. The shelves are located along the walls and are well labeled like for used books as well as ones published by Persephone Books – a woman-owned publisher based outside of London that can only be found in the United States at The Book Bus Depot.

The bookstore also had some lovely displays. They occasionally had cards written by staff members about the books they’ve read.

There were too many things that I loved about The Book Bus Depot, but one of the impressive things about it was the check-out desk that was designed to look like the book bus itself! I spent over $100 on books and a bag at that store, and I don’t regret it.

Overall, The Book Bus Depot is a wonderful bookstore that everybody should go to if they are ever in the Cincinnati area. It’s a run by a person who deeply cares about the importance of reading, and the store and the bus demonstrate that. The store is a welcoming place, where one could meet various book nerds of all kinds and stay in touch with them. Along with their website, you can check them out on Facebook and Instagram.

And that concludes the fourth installment of “Literary Travel!” I hope all of you had a great time on this trip. I hope to have another one to Las Vegas in the new year, so stay tuned for that!

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

Adapt Me Podcast – Firekeeper’s Daughter

Hi Everybody!

The latest episode of the Adapt Me Podcast is up right now. In it, guest Alyson Wick and I discuss how we would adapt Firekeeper’s Daughter by Angeline Boulley. We talk about how we would honor its spirit with tone and representation and even reveal the latest developments of the Netflix adaptation currently in production. Check it out at this link!

In the meantime, I have a review of the book itself, so check that out too!

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!

The Kingdom of Sweets Book Review

Full disclosure: I was given a copy of this book by Dutton and Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.

Christmas is around the corner, and that means more adaptations of timeless stories like The Nutcracker. Like many others, I grew up watching many versions and hearing its luscious score in television shows and films like Fantasia.  The characters and music have inspired many books, movies, and songs. This includes today’s subject The Kingdom of Sweets by Erika Johansen. It’s a dark and fresh take on the classic tale.

The Kingdom of Sweets is about a pair of twins cursed by birth whose lives are forever changed on one Christmas. When Natasha and Clara Stahlbaum were born, a mysterious sorcerer named Drosselmeyer bestowed them with their destinies. Clara is given light, and she becomes the favorite and grows into beauty and ease. On the other hand, Natasha is disposed with darkness and is perceived as being ugly. As a result, she stands in her sister’s shadow. But on one Christmas Eve, Natasha gets her opportunity for revenge, for Drosselmeyer brings a Nutcracker to the party, which provides an entry to the Kingdom of Sweets – a deceptively beautiful world. In the land of snow and sugar, Natasha encounters the Sugar Plum Fairy, who is full of gifts and bargains and is much more powerful than Drosselmeyer. As Natasha uncovers her dark destiny, she must reckon with the earthly and magical powers and decide on where she truly belongs.

Before I begin with this review, I want to mention some personal connections with The Nutcracker. When I was 5 years old, I danced as one of the clowns in my dance class when they were a part of The Nutcracker recital. Then, in my junior year of high school, my all-girl choir class got to sing the “Waltz of the Snowflakes” at the end of Act I for a production at the Detroit Opera House. Those were some wonderful experiences.

This is truly a fresh take on the story. Apparently, Johansen was inspired to write The Kingdom of Sweets upon asking why Drosselmeyer singled out Clara for the special gift in the original tale and ballet. I love the different interpretations of the well-known characters. The Sugar Plum Fairy in earlier versions tends to be a fairy who happens to be the one everyone looks up to in the kingdom. In this novel, she rules over the kingdom with an iron fist and makes it look different depending on who is visiting. LIke Natasha, she too is hell-bent on revenge. With Drosselmeyer, he is portrayed as a kind old godfather and inventor who disappears after he gives the Nutcracker to Clara. In this book, he is much more of an enigma who has experimented with the dark arts and might have more nefarious motives. Also, the family is indebted to him in many ways, including financially. And then, there is Clara. In many adaptations, she is a nice, albeit a bit bland, girl, who gets sucked into fighting some rats and the world of sweets. The Kingdom of Sweets does an overhaul on her by making her a beautiful, but spoiled teenager who gets everything she wants and doesn’t get punished. While I understand Natasha’s twin bond with Clara, I despised the latter because of how selfish she was. Clara was like Aurora from Sleeping Beauty except unlikeable.

I understand that some readers didn’t like how every character was bothersome. I think that this was deliberate. Since Natasha is bestowed with darkness, she sees the wolves in almost every person she encounters. Hence, the flaws are going to shine brighter from her point of view. With that being said, some reviewers mentioned that she is so unlikeable that they didn’t want to root for her. I will admit that Natasha tested my patience sometimes. She commits some horrific acts like one on Clara in order to be with the boy she thinks she loves. At the same time, the feelings of being left out and having something taken away from you with little to no reason at all are ones that I know all too well. Natasha has a hard time moving on from various injustices, and so do I. In addition, she realizes overtime that she has some lightness, while Clara possesses some darkness. On a side note, there wouldn’t be much of a story had Natasha simply let go of her love much quicker.

Now, let’s talk about the titular place. Despite its name, it isn’t so sweet. I mean, it was at first because it was designed to reflect the emotions of the human who enters it. For example, when Clara arrives, it is described like one would expect in the ballet with lots of snow on the outside and pink on the inside. The kingdom remains that way when Natasha gets in and enters the ball, but overtime, it becomes more dark and spooky to mirror her mental state. This too was a unique interpretation of the location as things are not always what they seem to be.

Despite my praise for the book, there are two things that bother me about it. The first is Natasha’s name. Why Natasha? In Nutcracker and the Mouse King by E.T.A. Hoffman and in the famous ballet, Clara has two siblings: a brother named Fritz and a sister named Louise. If it makes one feel better, I didn’t know that Clara had a sister until I started doing research for this review. Fritz is present in The Kingdom of Sweets, and he slowly descends into madness after he encounters the Nutcracker for the first time. But, there is no Louise. I’m assuming that Natasha is supposed to be Louise, but why? Did Johansen think that Natasha was a more suitable name for the dark one? If that’s so, she could’ve incorporated Louise like having the main character be named that, but when she leaves Russia, she could change it to Natasha to start anew, or vice versa. This would’ve paid tribute to the original sister while still maintaining the author’s interpretation of the material.

The second is the epilogue. The book itself is structured like a 5-act opera with an overture and curtain. This is ironic given that the best known adaptation of Nutcracker and the Mouse King is a two-act ballet. I don’t have a problem with this since it gives the story more structure than the ballet does. My problem is that the epilogue aka Curtain is unnecessary. It details the life that Natasha lives after she leaves Russia and includes what happened to that country when it was transformed into the Soviet Union. The novel sprinkles in some subtle historical references like Ratsputin, Lenin, and even Dracula throughout, for even fantasy books are rooted in some form of reality. However, the Curtain provided this more in a more heavy-handed way. Sometimes, it’s best to leave it to the reader’s imagination as to what happens at the end. I wish it would have done that.

Overall, The Kingdom of Sweets is a unique retelling of the beloved story of The Nutcracker. The darker tone brings out certain elements always present in the tale, but not always acknowledged, especially why Clara is chosen to have the nutcracker. It’s not perfect, but it’s a well suited story for this time of the season. I would recommend it to those who love stories about cursed sisters and the many versions of The Nutcracker. The book will be out tomorrow, so go check it out!

Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates. Also feel free to email me here for any review suggestions, ideas, or new titles!